13 min read
Lasers or X-rays: 7 Key Differences of Handheld LIBS vs XRF
The Rolling Stones or The Beatles? Spiderman or Batman? iPhone or Android? Is there a winner in each of these classic match-ups? Maybe. What we...
5 min read
Chris Carolan : Mar 13, 2023 6:01:58 PM
If you’re a metal maniac like me, I’m assuming you know about handheld XRF and what a staple it is in Positive Material Identification (and if not, here’s a handy article about that).
But there is another method that is perfectly capable of doing many PMI testing applications for metal identification, and it is, without doubt, a super cost-effective option.
RIgaku KT-100S handheld LIBS analyzer
Is it better than XRF? Like everything else in life, it depends. Read on and make the call for yourself.
Unfortunately, there is a surprising amount of misinformation and confusion around this technology.
I thought it would be a good idea to dig in and cover everything that’s important to know about LIBS (specifically, handheld LIBS).
The obvious question to start with is:
What is handheld LIBS? Handheld Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is the use of a laser rather than a spark or radiation to create light signature emissions that a detector and analyzer can use to determine the chemistry of a metal and provide alloy identification using a grade library.
In this article, we’re going to explore
Let’s get started!
Psst: This post is based on a podcast with co-host Chris Carolan. To hear this episode (and more like it), subscribe to The Manufacturing Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
iPhone Users Click Here for the Episode
The Rest Of Us Can Check It Out Here
LIBS stands for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. It’s actually in the same family as OES (Optical Emission Spectroscopy). It just uses a laser instead of a spark.
LIBS diagram
How it works:
This is how it’s able to tell you whether you’ve got stainless steel 316, aluminum 6061, aluminum 6063, Vibranium (just kidding; it doesn’t know Vibranium, but #WakandaForever).
Via HobbyLark
Handheld LIBS has only been around for 7 or 8 years, but the technology itself is actually about fifty years old.
It's been limited to laboratory benchtop instruments, but new technological advances have made it possible to miniaturize the laser while keeping the performance high.
This is what makes it possible to use in a handheld format: the handheld LIBS you see today.
Today, LIBS is a perfectly capable tool used to do a lot of the things XRF can do in a handheld format, faster, and safer.
Sad plot twist: a combination of factors like over-promising and lack of training has led users to distrust in the technology when handheld LIBS first came out.
Let me tell you some of the advantages and disadvantages of using handheld LIBS to give you an understanding of why you might consider using it instead of a handheld XRF.
LIBS |
XRF |
Fast. 1-3 seconds |
Slower. 5-20 seconds |
Time doesn’t vary: It takes the same amount of time regardless of the metal. |
Time varies: The time it takes is influenced by the application, the metal, and the user. |
No Ionizing Radiation. |
Ionizing Radiation. |
Less regulation: Most areas do not have regulations regarding handheld LIBS instruments. |
More regulation: You need a safety program, safety officers, more training, generally more regulatory requirements. |
Great Light Element Performance: Higher accuracy in 1-3 seconds for elements like Li, Be, Mg, Al, & Si. |
Weaker Light Element Performance: Cannot do Li or Be. Accurate testing for Mg, Al, & Si can take 15, 20, or even 30 seconds to match the grade. |
Lower Cost of Ownership:
|
Higher Cost of Ownership:
|
Buying an analyzer will run you between $20,000 and $40,000. The reason for the wide range is that there are a group of LIBS analyzers that can test for carbon and sometimes even non-metals.
Those are closer to $40,000. The other group that does not analyze carbon will run in the $20,000 to $30,000 range.
Master Tip: If you don't need Carbon values, don't pay the premium for it.
Beyond the purchase price, the cost of maintenance and ownership is very minimal compared to handheld XRF and OES.
What you must spend money on:
Yes, that's it.
When you consider the lifetime cost of the instrument, these analyzers are likely the most cost-effective choice for PMI in the industry.
Without proper training or understanding, people can make mistakes with handheld LIBS. These mistakes have led to the misconceptions about the performance and viability of LIBS versus handheld XRF.
For the most part, it comes down to sample preparation.
On the one hand, you’ve got handheld XRF:
On the other hand, with handheld LIBS:
All of this will get in the way. Sample preparation is very important and doesn't take as long as you think when done correctly.
With LIBS it’s very important to have a clean surface and to get perfect contact.
If you try to use it like a handheld XRF, you’ll probably produce inconsistent results because surface contaminants will have a bigger impact.
Sadly, a lack of training and understanding has led to these common mistakes. Beyond sample preparation, here are three extra tips to know so you can be a master at LIBS:
These are the current manufacturers of handheld LIBS instruments:
Unlike handheld XRF, there's not really a market leader for handheld LIBS yet. This is mostly due to its relative newness in the field.
Props for taking the time. You are now a Jedi when it comes to LIBS vs the other PMI methods!
Here are a few points I hope you got from this article:
Until next time, Never Stop Testing Your Metals!
For more information on positive material identification or LIBS, subscribe to The Manufacturing Show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
13 min read
The Rolling Stones or The Beatles? Spiderman or Batman? iPhone or Android? Is there a winner in each of these classic match-ups? Maybe. What we...
15 min read
There have been a handful of truly revolutionary inventions throughout history. Fire. The wheel. Electricity. Donuts. The handheld XRF. No, I’m not...
13 min read
It’s tough for me to hear about accidents in the news caused by faulty parts and materials. Take, for example, the most recent SpaceX dilemma that...